1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1983 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 190 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford GT 40 | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | GT 40 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2260 mm |
