1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJR. (252 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 533 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 1990 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | GT 40 | XJR |
Year Released | 1972 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 377 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 102 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2880 mm |