1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1999 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1999 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1999 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 1999 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | GT 40 | Wagon |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 67 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2330 mm |