1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 260 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1450 mm |