1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (305 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 350 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford GT 40 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | GT 40 | Omega |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 52 L |
