1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 325 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan HyperMini (130 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan HyperMini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40. 2001 Nissan HyperMini has automatic transmission and 1972 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1972 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan HyperMini will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | HyperMini |
Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 76 L |