1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 398 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | GT 40 | B2300 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 62 L |