1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2010 Fiat Siena is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Siena weights approximately 130 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Siena (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2010 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | GT 40 | Siena |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 47 L |