1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 207 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1972 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1972 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2490 mm |