1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2010 Nissan NP300. (131 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan NP300.
Because 2010 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | NP300 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 75 L |