1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Renault Megane

To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.

Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Ford GT 40 2010 Renault Megane
Make Ford Renault
Model GT 40 Megane
Year Released 1972 2010
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 112 HP
Engine RPM 7200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 152 Nm
Engine Bore Size 95.6 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72.9 mm 80.5 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2050 mm
Vehicle Height 980 mm 1470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 125 L 60 L