1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 282 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2360 mm |