1972 Ford LTD vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford LTD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford LTD would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1972 Ford LTD. (163 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford LTD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford LTD weights approximately 729 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford LTD. (376 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford LTD.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford LTD | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | LTD | E-150 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3927 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 132 L |