1972 Ford Maverick vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 7,253 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (582 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 501 more horse power than 1972 Ford Maverick. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 790 kg more than 1972 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (721 Nm) has 546 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Maverick | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Maverick | ML |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 7253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 582 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 721 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |