1972 Ford Maverick vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1972 Ford Maverick. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Maverick weights approximately 160 kg more than 2004 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Maverick (175 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford Maverick | 2004 MG TF | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Maverick | TF |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |
