1972 Ford Maverick vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1972 Ford Maverick. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1972 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Ford Maverick is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Maverick. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Maverick | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Maverick | 75 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |