1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 1972 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 216 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1949 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Mustang | RM A |
Year Released | 1972 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2870 mm |