1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 1972 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (267 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 914 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1963 Renault 8 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 8 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5753 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 38 L |