1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 1985 Mazda 323 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,090 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 580 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (254 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 323 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4090 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 870 kg |