1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Nissan Stagea
To start off, 1996 Nissan Stagea is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan Stagea is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Stagea will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (417 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Stagea. (362 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Stagea.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1996 Nissan Stagea | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Stagea |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5753 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 417 Nm | 362 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.8 mm | 73.4 mm |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 244 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2730 mm |