1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 719 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 50 L |