1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Mustang. (385 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | HRT |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5753 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 815 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |