1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Kia Optima
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 39 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (385 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 2005 Kia Optima | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Optima |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5753 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 199 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.8 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1527 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 65 L |