1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,752 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (330 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 291 kg more than 2005 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (502 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (200 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: