1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1972 Ford Mustang. (141 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (328 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1972 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1972 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford Mustang | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Ford | SsangYong |
| Model | Mustang | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3010 mm |
