1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1972 Ford Mustang. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Mustang.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford Mustang | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2490 mm |
