1972 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,752 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (330 HP) has 220 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (502 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Cruze |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5752 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 502 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2685 mm |