1972 Ford Torino vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Ford Torino is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Torino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Torino (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Torino should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Torino weights approximately 822 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Torino (403 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Torino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford Torino | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Torino | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6555 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 403 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1992 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |
