1972 Ford Torino vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Torino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Torino would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1972 Ford Torino. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Torino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Torino weights approximately 153 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Torino. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Torino. 2008 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1972 Ford Torino has manual transmission. 1972 Ford Torino will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Torino | 2008 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Torino | XJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4095 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 85 L |