1972 Holden Belmont vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1972 Holden Belmont is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Belmont | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |