1972 Holden Belmont vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 405 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Belmont | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2770 mm |