1972 Holden Belmont vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 235 kg more than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Belmont | Zo |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2580 mm |