1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1972 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW X5 (290 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 2002 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Holden | BMW |
Model | Belmont | X5 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |