1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Holden Belmont | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Belmont | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 229 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2380 mm |
