1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 460 kg more than 1972 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Belmont | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |