1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 164 kg more than 1972 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (281 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.

Compare all specifications: