1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Belmont | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Belmont | UTE |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 229 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |