1972 Holden Belmont vs. 2010 Honda Civic

To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 20 kg more than 2010 Honda Civic.

Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Belmont (229 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Civic. (174 Nm). This means 1972 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications: