1972 Holden Monaro vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Monaro (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 420 kg more than 1972 Holden Monaro.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Holden Monaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Monaro. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Monaro | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Monaro | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2540 mm |