1972 Holden Monaro vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1972 Holden Monaro. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Monaro.
Because 1972 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Monaro. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Monaro | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Monaro | C70 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1840 mm |