1972 Holden Torana vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (55 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Torana weights approximately 3 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (91 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Holden Torana | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Torana | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1159 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2320 mm |
