1972 Holden Torana vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,977 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada 110 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Holden Torana | 2000 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Holden | Lada |
| Model | Torana | 110 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1159 cc | 1977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2500 mm |
