1972 Holden Torana vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Torana weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Torana (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Holden Torana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Torana | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | Torana | Smart |
Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |