1972 Holden Torana vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Torana | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Torana | 6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |