1972 Holden Torana vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 1972 Holden Torana has manual transmission. 1972 Holden Torana will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Holden Torana | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Torana | M |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 462 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
