1972 Holden Torana vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Holden Torana | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Holden | Audi |
Model | Torana | A6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2911 mm |