1972 Honda 1300 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1972 Honda 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Honda 1300 (81 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Honda 1300 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1972 Honda 1300.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 120 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Honda 1300 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 120 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1778 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 45 L |