1972 Honda Z vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Honda Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Honda Z would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1972 Honda Z. (24 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1972 Honda Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Honda Z. (30 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Honda Z | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Honda | Volkswagen |
Model | Z | Polo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 30 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2470 mm |