1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (251 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jaguar | MCC |
Model | XJ | Smart |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1460 mm |