1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (265 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 300 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Jaguar XJ | 1998 Acura CL | |
| Make | Jaguar | Acura |
| Model | XJ | CL |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5344 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |
